If he had used common core he would have obtained the correct answer. That is, it’s correct if he showed his work… and tried real hard… and was a good person.
This reminds me of programming and syntax errors.
“Why won’t it work!!!” *tears hair out*.
Seriously though, I hear if a physics problem starts making sense, you are entirely wrong. If you start getting confused, you are on the right path.
Why does every aspect of popular media embrace 42 as part of it’s narrative when it comes to math? WTF (what the fourier [transform]). It was a stupid book and a stupid show, get over it!
Carry On.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
As a major in astrophysics, this is accurately accurate.
Of course it’s accurate. Eatliver never get things wrong.
Natural sciences can be hard… for pussies.
If he had used common core he would have obtained the correct answer. That is, it’s correct if he showed his work… and tried real hard… and was a good person.
This reminds me of programming and syntax errors.
“Why won’t it work!!!” *tears hair out*.
Seriously though, I hear if a physics problem starts making sense, you are entirely wrong. If you start getting confused, you are on the right path.
Why does every aspect of popular media embrace 42 as part of it’s narrative when it comes to math? WTF (what the fourier [transform]). It was a stupid book and a stupid show, get over it!
Carry On.
The joke is that THE answer isn’t the answer this time.
42 is the answer to everything.