That National Geographic photo is stupid. The bags are dangerous in the ocean, not if you throw them in garbage or recycle them. Not very dangerous when transporting your magazine.
I worked for a a city just outside of Montreal and the sad fact about recycling is that just about 10% of recycling actually gets done. The rest just goes to landfills. the reason for this is that most people don’t pay attention to what they throw out and where they put it. it’s not cost effective to have to sort trash. In short if people took it seriously more things could be recycled.
With the “Flickering Lights,” a bit of kerning would fix that one right up.
Sure. That’s what she said.
That’s not wall paint.
Yes kerning matters a lot. There are meme pics of a cake wishing happy birthday to guy CLINT.
I think the recycling bin is supposed to have two different bags.
Yes but they don’t put them in, all of the ones I have seen in Montreal are like this, one bag and multiple holes. Nonsense!
That National Geographic photo is stupid. The bags are dangerous in the ocean, not if you throw them in garbage or recycle them. Not very dangerous when transporting your magazine.
The point I’d to stop using the bags, bc then they’ll go into the ocean.
That may have been true years ago but National Geographic now mails their magazine inside a recyclable paper envelope.
I worked for a a city just outside of Montreal and the sad fact about recycling is that just about 10% of recycling actually gets done. The rest just goes to landfills. the reason for this is that most people don’t pay attention to what they throw out and where they put it. it’s not cost effective to have to sort trash. In short if people took it seriously more things could be recycled.
Criminy, how did I end up back here?