Another Example of Confusing Liberal Logic

{36 Comments}

36 Comments…

 Share your views
  1. The Good German April 24, 2017

    Apples are fruit. You can eat them. Potatoes you can eat too. So potatoes are fruit. Wrong.
    Don’t compare two completly different things that follow different principles.
    Only because you intellect doesn’t comprehend scientific facts and methods doesn’t mean you are right, morons. So sad.

    • Don’t get all butthurt right away. This is obviously a troll post.

    • The Good German April 25, 2017

      I was going to bed. So I had to make it short and clear. Hehe.

  2. Flossy McHookerpants April 24, 2017

    Playing both sides. This should be fun. Incoming butthurt in 3…2…

  3. Hell Toupee April 25, 2017

    What’s confusing about this? Badly failed trolling attempt.

    • I believe you may be correct. I had originally thought that the EatLiver dude was an idiot, but it turns out that they may be a different sort of idiot entirely.

  4. 2/10, and the only reason you’re getting that is because you hooked someone.

  5. Just Sayin' April 25, 2017

    OP thinks it’s OK for faceless multibillion dollar corporate fascists to make choices which adversely affect the entire planet, but gets his panties in a bunch when an individual makes makes a positive choice for their own life that doesn’t affect him **AT ALL**l. (And yes, OP is most likely a sad beta male failure who’s has run out of things to complain about.)

  6. Sadly Average Male April 25, 2017

    Whoa! Put your Prius in Gender Neutral snowflake!

  7. sweetshewbakabra April 25, 2017

    I doubt that any of the persons or bots giving comments here have ever read anything better than secondary literature on any scientific investigation. Trey Parker/Matt Stoned, help me out here…again.

    • A tax by any other name... April 25, 2017

      I read the email excerpts from the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University. Does that count?

  8. Fred Weller April 25, 2017

    The two statements are independent and unrelated. You might as well assail conservative logic for claiming that taxes should be reduced and yet also claiming that marriage is between a man and a woman. Apples, meet oranges.

  9. Observation April 25, 2017

    1) Liberal logic is an oxymoron
    2) There is no such thing as settled science. Anyone that says so doesn’t know how science works.

    • So, Observation, you’re denying that these things are settled? I’d just like to check. There was no general agreement on them a thousand years ago and I guess you think they still aren’t settled, but I’d like to sure.
      1. Water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level.
      2. The earth orbits the sun.
      3. Acceleration of a falling object is a function of the strength of the gravitational field rather than the mass of the falling object.
      4. Light shined on a metal surface generates an electrical field on the metal surface.
      5. There is no charge inside a closed conductor.

    • Apparently Observation logic is a moron.

    • Remember that just a few hundred years ago it “settled science” that the Earth was flat. Just before that it was “settled science” that the Earth was the center of the universe. About the same time it was “settled science” that there were four elements that made up everything in the universe. Up until the nineteenth century it was widely accepted that life arose from inanimate matter. Into the twentieth century maternal impression was considered to be the source of birth defects. I could go on and on, but I have made my point. I doubt, however, that you understand.

    • Lazier Than Thou April 25, 2017

      @BBJ
      Not a single one of those things you listed are settled science. Every single one of them can be challenged with a new, better understanding of the universe. That’s the beauty and horror of science. It’s always moving, closer and closer to the truth, but we don’t know precisely where “truth” is or where the end is. There’s no distinct line that says “all things after this point are true.”

    • More recently is the idea of eugenics which was widely accepted in the US and many other countries. Additionally, California lead the country in forced sterilizations and promoted the idea to the Nazis who got support from the Rockefeller Foundation.
      It was accepted as valid science principle then.

    • Thanks all for the responses. Contrary to what you may presume about my own understanding of the history of science and the philosophy of science, it was the core of my undergrad study. This is one reason I used the word “settled” instead of “complete and final explanation.”
      Each of the things I listed was an observation, not an explanation of a cause, or even a prediction. Science is concerned with all of those. You can always refine explanations and predictions, and observations for that matter, but that doesn’t mean you can’t agree that certain phenomena are “settled.”

    • @Just me
      Science has nothing to do with morals. If you are rotten on the inside you are still rotten no matter if you go to church or university.

    • Settled Grammer National Socialist Workers Party April 26, 2017

      @BBJ
      Change “but I’d like to sure”
      to “but I’d like to BE sure”

  10. This picture causes moron particles off the scale. Whoever made this should see a doctor for immediate brain transfusion.

  11. Let's change the subject April 26, 2017

    Is the person in the bottom frame Bill Nye the bi guy? Because honestly, you can’t be a man one day and a woman the next or some bizarre conglomeration of imaginary genders all at once. For all you people that just “swear” by the immutable laws of science, DNA says humans have two choices; male or female.

    • In short: nope. Intersexuality does exist. Reducing the whole subject to XX vs XY is primary school level.

    • Let's change the subject April 27, 2017

      Making up new words exists. Making up new genders doesn’t.

    • What would you say to someone who’s a two-gendered chimera?
      You puritan, 17th century, simple minded people.
      Religion will make the world easy.
      Science will make you understand it.

    • Lucy, can you ‘splain to us which gender a hermaphrodite is?

  12. Prince Leo April 27, 2017

    If you don’t apply enough pressure, gender will be gas

    • That’s why I like usin the handicapped stalls when I gotta poop. Them grab bars make for some great power squeezin!

    • And so Prince Leo was born.

    • YoMomma so fat she walk by and I couldn’t see the WalMart for 5 minutes.

  13. Classic Liberal April 28, 2017

    This isn’t liberal logic. It’s stupid people logic. As a liberal i’m tired of being lumped in with these mouthbreathers.

    • Pinto Carvalho April 30, 2017

      The definition of liberal has changed to match the changes in the definition of gender.

Leave a Comment

Name and email is required. Your email address will not be published.