Proud American (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
USA is govedo (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Please, USA, have some sort of Judeo-white vs. Afro-Hispano, uppy class vs. low mud, north vs. south civil war! Any kind, just go, and test those guns out! That would freshen our evening news... TNX!
^^^ (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
If the whole Southeast were to secede I don't think the rest of us would try to stop them.
Chickinlickin (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Hold on a minute, Disney World is okay. And Key West, they would secede from the seceders (is that an English word or a Tea Bag word/)
Okay there is some bad with the good. But then again, the right to work rules would make vacationing there real cheap. Like any other third world nation.
^^^ (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
You would be wise to not try.
Heckler und Koch (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
I think all the stocking up on firearms might be a preparation for a new civil war in the States. Isn't that what the USA has always been doing and what is granted by the constitution (be able to uprise against the government in case they don like it)?
Smith & Wesson (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Not necessarily a civil war, but the threat of one can go a long way to protecting civil rights. That's what the 2nd Amedment gives us. Protection from oppressive government - if necessary. If you had those rights back in1932, maybe there would never have been a WWII.
@Smith & Wesson (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
hitler was democratically elected you moron
@Smith & Wesson (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
So, according to the Second Ammendment, which well regulated militia do you belong to? Can all you scared little gun nuts please just leave the rest of us alone?
debaungrat (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
@@smith&wesson: How he was selected is irrelevant. People resist AFTER the regime becomes oppressive.
winterhog (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
@Smith & Wesson - Across Europe, gun control laws were generally far more lenient in the 30's than now (more or less anyone with clear criminal record could buy a gun). Also, I don't exactly remember any popular uprising when Volstead Act came into life, though it directly undermined several branches of private enterprise. Gun is only a tool. Without a will behind it is just a hunk of metal.
Jacob (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
@"@Smith & Wesson"
My militia is called the Cribs.
@@Smith & Wesson (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the [PEOPLE] to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So, according to the Second Amendment, I don't HAVE to be part of a well regulated militia, Dipshit. Also, I don't remember ever hearing anyone suggest that we force everyone to carry a firearm; so, from where I'm sitting, we are leaving you alone. I'd just like the same courtesy.
Webley & Scott (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
What do you say to the argument that, since there's no chance of an invasion from either Canada or Mexico, and since the natives have been pacified, the Second Amendment (of 1791) is obsolete, and should be either re-written or scrapped? Just curious.
@@Smith & Wesson (Wednesday, 9 Jan 2013)
I believe that the point of the second amendment is not just to ensure that the people have the ability to defend from an invading force, but also to ensure that the power to overthrow an oppressive government remains in the hands of it's people; this is supported by numerous writings from our founding fathers. Corrupt and tyrannical governments have, currently do, and always will exist. I think it naive and prideful to say that the U.S. (as well as Canada, Mexico, or any government for that matter) is the exception to this. I'm not at a point where I'm calling for revolution, but having the means to carry one out is essential to keeping any government in check.
Piers Morgan (Wednesday, 9 Jan 2013)
@ Smith & Wesson no need to hide from me here, Mr Jones.
@@Smith & Wesson (Friday, 11 Jan 2013)
"a well-regulated militia" IS the people, trained in arms. the Amendment does not say "a well-defined State militia" ... the people ARE the militia (at least, as understood at the time, all white males capable of carrying a firearm are). (See also 10 U.S.C. § 311).
(Redneck) (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
Why need a health-plan, guns heal all pain
American (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
You are not a Redneck. Rednecks have more common sense than you.
USA? (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
USA is officially a third world country.
A third world country consists of: (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Little to no government
Most of the population in abject poverty.
None of which describes the United States
Chcikinlickin (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Hey third world, you did describe the southeast. Of course they third world also usually means lower than average education, also something in the southeast.
Cletus (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
Ahm goin to hed on out to the parkin lot an git me wun of them amtrakky thungs
Prez Obama (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
Problem with white "Mericans is they cling to their Bible and their guns. I HATE white people. Maybe if I keep letting more Mexicans in, I can make whites a minority, and then i can implement all of my socialist ideas !!!!
VP Joe B (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Barry WAIT ! We haven't yet confiscated all their guns, then we'll crush those who think the Constitution will protect them.
Nancy Pelosi (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Yo Joe ... you got to keep that on the QT and btw nice ass ; )
Europe,cradle of civilisation. Us, end of it. (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
USA, All the Way....to Hell. The problem is that you cant even discuss it with them. Their arguments always ends out with "america-hater".
French Frog (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
^ American hater ^
Unamused (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
Hows that Euro coming along?
Don Mclean (Monday, 7 Jan 2013)
You are all trying to imitate us, so haters gonna hate and we will keep on being awesome.
Thx for Hitler (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
facepalm phil (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
Pop a cap (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
You could put up a picture of a Chicago (Philly, DC, Detroit, etc) gangbanger doin a drive by and label it proud democrat. Same difference.
Latvian (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
They will never take my potato gun!
winterhog (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
And I thought Americans generally know how to handle firearms. So many broken safety rules in one picture...
EUro (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
OMG, ugly people with guns. Oh... americans.
Just sayin' (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
Cordite makes men impotent & atrophies brain cells.
Gun owner (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
If we all had a gun, how long would it take to get rid of the criminals? Just wondering.
Gun Religion (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
Depends on who shoots first. Your gun serves you a sh.. with a bullet in the head. Anyway, why do you think people shooting in cinemas and schools wear bullet proof vests? He'll laugh at your gun and put a bullet through your brain with his easy to get semi-automatic rifle. With guns unavailable that easy, it's harder for such people and criminals to get one. And there are other ways to overturn governments. Except the USA are a third world countrywithout democracy... ok, US democracy is strange. If you are afraid of your precious country. But no one in the world wonders. That's what you get if banned criminals and religious fanatics build a state.
:-) (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
Where do I get a t-shirt for myself?
American (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
**** guns! Crazy people going killing poor children... it's not acceptable
Free & Fake American (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
God gave us the gun to use it. You are incomplete without a gun.
logic (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
As i see some gun haters here, what is wrong with a person haveing a right to own a gun to protect themselves? The only counter to a gun, is chuck norris, or another gun, used either more skillfully, or a higher level of gun. Obvidiously people dont need rocket launchers and nukes to defend themselves, but guns can be countered with other guns. Nobody is forceing you to own a gun, if you dont want, but it is there if you decide you do want one. Banning guns will not solve the problem(criminals with guns), as criminals dont follow the law. Drugs are banned, yet you can easily get them. So banning guns only makes it harder for a law abiding person to get one. Instead of looking to ban guns to solve these massacres we should look how to stop a person from even considering doing this kinda thing, ie raiseing kids better and teaching them to be more loveing, and out going.
ILoveGunz (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
Point. I mean look at this guy in the picture. He's a citizen of one of the wealthiest countries in the world. He's got a hundred times easier than for example ordinary african. Yet he looks full of hatred towards his own president like the guy went and killed his family. Btw, what would you need an assault rifle for? Hunting?
@ILoveGunz (Thursday, 17 Jan 2013)
please provide me with a meaningful definition of "assault rifle" ... because the politicians can't!
KJ (Monday, 7 Jan 2013) Reply
I'd bet you my last dime that that redneck worships Lord Jesus. If so, I wonder how that's working for him.
SIG-AMT (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013) Reply
Civilian Bushmaster: (visit link)
Government Bushmaster: (visit link)
Good luck with that “uprise” against the government.
Boo (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
Yeah, but it's a whole new ball game when you're ordered to attack your own countrymen and bomb your own citites. There will be military grade weapons on both sides should the SHTF.
u still don't get it (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
In the US, gun owners outnumber the military and law enforcement more than 100 to 1. It would be guerilla warfare, not conventional. An insurgent cell could be one person with a sniper rifle, no way for gov't to infiltrate. You're also assuming the military would fire on citizens, 40 million of which are verterans. Could just as likely be a military coup against the gov't. μολὼν λαβέ.
winterhog (Friday, 11 Jan 2013)
@Boo - Yes, most like with majority of citizens supporting government that just 'tries to suppress far-right terrorists trying to enforce their fascist agenda through violence'. Pen is mightier than a sword. TV is mightier than a rifle.
True or False? (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013) Reply
Look, they have you guys right where they want you. Ready to fight against each other without even debating whether or not Obama is a liar or not. A word of caution, don't trust any of them. All politicians want either an expansion of wealth or an expansion of power.
The question is (Tuesday, 8 Jan 2013)
Are they going to carry you along with them? Or do they aim to trample you under foot?
White Man (Thursday, 10 Jan 2013) Reply
He's racist too. That fits.
Christy (Thursday, 10 Jan 2013) Reply
Exactly why republicans are the joke of America.
Stirner (Friday, 11 Jan 2013) Reply
He may be as well an anarchist.
Southern (Monday, 21 Jan 2013) Reply
!It's funny because all good northern jobs are coming down south! !Better yet northern everything crumbling and falling apart! Boom shaka laka.
brian (Thursday, 24 Jan 2013) Reply
stupid human ....human stupid
gun lover (Saturday, 4 May 2013) Reply
GO HIM , love the shirt and the bolt action rifle, i need that shirt NOW :)
gun lover (Saturday, 4 May 2013) Reply
i also need that hat its harley-davidson to go along with his awesome shirt and guns